| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Transit Connect and 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Transit Connect | Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,063 mm | 2,852 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 4,818 mm | 4,836 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,834 mm | 1,918 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,829 mm | 1,377 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,805 kg | 1,715 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 72 L | -12 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,191 mm | 950 mm | -949 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,466 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,387 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,146 mm | 897 mm | -896 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,280 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 759 mm | 196 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 1,049 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,430 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,194 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,836 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 320 L | 241 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,668 L | 11.3 | -10.3 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,951 L | 11.3 | -9.3 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Transit Connect
| 2014 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Ford Transit Connect.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
