Ford Transit Connect vs. Chevrolet Camaro MPG

Chart is based on 1 fuel economy reports for the Ford Transit Connect and 147 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet Camaro.

Ford Transit Connect MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2013	4dr Minivan 136-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	0	5	60	35	65	24.8

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Transit Connect fuel economy data.

Chevrolet Camaro MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2015	2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	hills	med	none	5	20	35	40	75	22.3
2014	2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	none	10	90	0	0	0	15.8
2013	2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	hills	med	light	11	17	28	44	80	24.3
2012	2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	0	10	35	55	60	18.5
2012	2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	none	0	0	0	100	75	23.1
2012	2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	10	30	10	50	75	18.2
2011	2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	0	40	18	43	60	16.5
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2011	2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	lead	light	0	2	36	62	77	22.7
2011	2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	hills	lead	light	0	20	0	80	80	20.9
2010	2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	3	10	17	70	89	21.5
2010	2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	5	22	28	45	74	18.1
2010	2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	7	25	14	55	62	21.6
2010	2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	9	17	30	44	67	23.8
2002	2dr Hatch 310-horsepower 5.7L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	4	12	43	41	72	19.9
2002	2dr Hatch 200-horsepower 3.8L V6 5-speed manual RWD	hills	med	none	0	10	60	31	120	28.2
2002	2dr Convertible 310-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	light	light	0	35	65	0	0	22.6

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chevrolet Camaro fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Chevrolet models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

Ford Transit Connect Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2014	With less size and weight and a smaller engine, the Ford Transit Connect does get better fuel economy than a conventional minivan...but its advantage isn't large. The Ford's EPA ratings--20 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--best the Toyota Sienna's by two in the city and three on the highway. But the Honda Odyssey is rated 19/28. On the other hand, the much smaller, much lighter Mazda5 only managed 21/28. What's going on? Well, the Ford is very tall, so even though it's narrower it's pushing nearly as much frontal area through the air. This especially matters on the highway. Also, the Transit Connect is not much lighter, 3,979 lbs. to the Sienna's 4,310. Two tons is a lot of weight for a 2.5-liter four-cylinder to motivate. In the real-world, a light foot in the suburbs could nudge the trip computer average to 27 (even 30 on one trip). The Odyssey's trip computer reported numbers about five below these, while the Sienna struggled to crack 20. Push the Transit Connect a bit harder, and the trip computer average dropped to about 23, still good for a vehicle its size. But was the trip computer accurate? The gas gauge needle fell much faster than these numbers suggested it should have. On a 70-mph highway, even the trip computer numbers were short of the EPA rating, about 25. The big minivans can do this well. Blame the Ford's frontal area. The Transit Connect's fuel economy advantage is chiefly in urban and suburban driving. see full Ford Transit Connect review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Ford Transit Connect.

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Camaro

Chevrolet Camaro Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Comment
	Another fairly obvious "why not to buy," for either car: fuel economy. The tested Camaro scored 16 mpg city and 25 mpg highway in the EPA's tests, slightly better than the Mustang's 15/25. The automatic has an even taller top gear and when paired with it the V8 can deactivate four cylinders, so it manages 17 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--the latter figure as high as that for the Camaro V6 automatic (19/28). For significantly better fuel economy it's necessary to get the 2.0-liter turbo, which scores 21/30 with a manual and 22/31 with an automatic. In my 300-odd miles of driving I averaged 16.5 mpg. If I drove with a light foot I could coax the average slightly over 20. I observed similar real-world numbers in the Mustang. On a 70-mph highway the Camaro averaged 24.5, but there might have been a modest headwind. The Mustang averaged 28 in my highway driving. Overall, both achieve very good fuel efficiency for cars of their weight and horsepower, but praise doesn't come much fainter. see full Chevrolet Camaro review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Camaro

Chevrolet Camaro Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2017	2dr Coupe 455-horsepower 6.2L V8 8-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Surprisingly, this 455hp car, with a 6.2L V8 -- that's 378 cubic inches -- gets decent gas mileage. It averages just over 20mpg, for which I credit the cylinder shutoff feature. So far it's been pretty common to look at the dash when I'm just beetling across town and see that it's in V4 mode, and getting 40 or 50mpg, as long as I'm keeping my right loafer rather light. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2012	2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	avg 18city/22hwy see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010	2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	i am getting 25 mpg at 75 mph with a custom tune from DiabloSport. compared to the challenger srt-8 which gets 16 mpg highway! see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010	2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	great considering its at 426 HP see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010	2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Fuel economy is really great if your not mashing the gas pedal. see full Chevrolet Camaro review