| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 GMC Canyon and 2013 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2013 | |
| Model | GMC Canyon | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 GMC Canyon
| 2006 GMC Canyon Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 185-horsepower 2.9L I4 5-speed manual RWD |
The two small jump seats in the extended cab are very tight, almost useless for an adult. Also, the plastic hardware on the storage boxes is cheap. see full GMC Canyon review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Taurus
| 2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all GMC models.
