Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
Model | GMC Terrain | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 112.5 in | 107.1 in | 5.4 in |
Length | 185.3 in | 188.3 in | -3 in |
Width | 72.8 in | 75.4 in | -2.6 in |
Height | 66.3 in | 54.4 in | 11.9 in |
Curb Weight | 3853 lb. | 3526 lb. | 327 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 18.8 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 2.8 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.8 in | 37.6 in | 2.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.7 in | 56.3 in | -0.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 54.9 in | 0.2 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 42.0 in | -0.8 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.2 in | 34.8 in | 4.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.3 in | 52.2 in | 3.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 47.4 in | 3.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 39.9 in | 30.6 in | 9.3 in |
Total Legroom | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 8.5 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 31.6 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 18.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 63.9 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 50.4 ft3 |
2010 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Plenty of leg room for all in the back seat. Very spacious. see full GMC Terrain review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The cloth power seat are very comfortable. see full GMC Terrain review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Plenty of room. see full GMC Terrain review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
great, lots of room for a 6ft.3in teenager see full GMC Terrain review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Plenty of rear seat lag room with seat fully slide back. see full GMC Terrain review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Comfortable vehicle for driver and front seat passenger see full GMC Terrain review |
2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.