GMC Terrain (2014) vs. Ford Mustang (2003) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2014 GMC Terrain and 2003 Ford Mustang specs.
2014 GMC Terrain and 2003 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year |
2014 |
2003 |
|
| Model |
GMC Terrain |
Ford Mustang |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 GMC Terrain
| 2013 |
The GMC Terrain's long wheelbase also pays off with noticeably more rear seat leg room than in competitors. In fact, there's a little more combined legroom in the first two rows than in the far larger Yukon XL, and a few more inches than in the larger Acadia. Sound like enough space to fit a third row? Perhaps, but GM opted not to offer one. The Terrain is thoroughly compact in width. The larger GMCs remain much better options for transporting three adults in the back seat. They're also better for carrying cargo. The Terrain's cargo floor is long, but its also high and narrow, and the second-row seats don't fold flat.
see full GMC Terrain review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 GMC Terrain
| 2015 |
4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought.
see full GMC Terrain review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang
| 2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD |
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor.
see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD |
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats.
But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker.
see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVsSee TrueDelta's information for all
GMC models.
