GMC Terrain GMC Terrain 2016 Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2014

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

GMC Terrain (2016) vs. Ford Mustang (2014) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 GMC Terrain and 2014 Ford Mustang specs.

2016 GMC Terrain and 2014 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year 2016 2014  
Model GMC Terrain Ford Mustang  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 4dr SUV 2dr Coupe  
      Difference
Wheelbase 112.5 in 107.1 in 5.4 in
Length 185.5 in 188.5 in -3 in
Width 72.8 in 73.9 in -1.1 in
Height 66.3 in 55.8 in 10.5 in
Curb Weight 3792 lb. 3501 lb. 291 lb.
Fuel Capacity 18.8 gal. 16.0 gal. 2.8 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 39.8 in 38.5 in 1.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 55.7 in 55.3 in 0.4 in
Hip Room, Row 1 55.1 in 53.4 in 1.7 in
Legroom, Row 1 41.2 in 42.4 in -1.2 in
Headroom, Row 2 39.2 in 34.7 in 4.5 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 55.3 in 47.8 in 7.5 in
Hip Room, Row 2 51.3 in 46.8 in 4.5 in
Legroom, Row 2 39.9 in 29.8 in 10.1 in
Total Legroom 81.1 in (over 2 rows) 72.2 in (over 2 rows) 8.9 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 31.6 ft3 13.4 ft3 18.2 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 63.9 ft3 13.4 ft3 50.5 ft3

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 GMC Terrain

2016 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2015 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang

2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang

2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all GMC models.