Model Year | 2007 | 2016 | |
Model | GMC Yukon | GMC Terrain | |
Engine | 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 380 hp@5700 417 lb-ft@4400 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 301 hp@6500 272 lb-ft@4800 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 112.5 in | 3.5 in |
Length | 202.0 in | 185.5 in | 16.5 in |
Width | 79.0 in | 72.8 in | 6.2 in |
Height | 76.9 in | 66.3 in | 10.6 in |
Curb Weight | 5635 lb. | 4151 lb. | 1484 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal. | 18.8 gal. | 7.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.1 in | 39.8 in | 1.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 65.3 in | 55.7 in | 9.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 64.4 in | 55.1 in | 9.3 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.2 in | 0.1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.2 in | 39.2 in | 0 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 65.2 in | 55.3 in | 9.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 51.3 in | 9.3 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 39.9 in | -0.9 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 37.9 in | 0.0 in | 37.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.7 in | 0.0 in | 61.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 49.1 in | 0.0 in | 49.1 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 25.6 in | 0.0 in | 25.6 in |
Total Legroom | 105.9 in (over 3 rows) | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | 24.8 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.9 ft3 | 31.6 ft3 | -14.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 60.3 ft3 | 31.6 | 28.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 108.9 ft3 | 63.9 ft3 | 45 ft3 |
2007 GMC Yukon Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
The standard power seat offers unlimited seating positions. see full GMC Yukon review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 335-horsepower 6.0L V8 4-speed automatic AWD |
The seats are big, have a good amount of padding, and still provide some side lubar support to help keep you in the seat during hard cornering. see full GMC Yukon review |
2016 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |