| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Honda Accord and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | Honda Accord | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,741 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,849 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,849 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,433 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,396 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 61 L | 9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 993 mm | 955 mm | 38 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,483 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 884 mm | 28 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,176 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 838 mm | 777 mm | 61 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,918 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 337 L | 382 L | -45 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Honda Accord
| 2011 Honda Accord Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Another reason I'm glad I got the EX model. The power lumbar on the drivers seat is my backs best friend. Even after 16 hour days and 1100 miles, my back is fine. Excellent seats! see full Honda Accord review |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
6'4" and plenty of head and leg room. Leather seats and lumbar support fit me well. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Spacing is good, material use is comfortable. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2011 Honda Accord Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Lumbar support is too aggressive, and it is non-adjustable in the LX model. I have gotten used to them, but they are nowhere near the same league as my previously owned Saabs and BMWs. see full Honda Accord review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
