| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda CR-V and 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2014 | |
| Model | Honda CR-V | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | 2.4L I4 DOHC-4v 185 hp@7000 163 lb-ft@4400 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 320 hp@5400 335 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 103.1 in | 116.0 in | -12.9 in |
| Length | 178.3 in | 202.0 in | -23.7 in |
| Width | 71.6 in | 79.0 in | -7.4 in |
| Height | 64.7 in | 76.9 in | -12.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 3426 lb. | 5567 lb. | -2141 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.3 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -10.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.9 in | 41.1 in | -1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.6 in | 65.3 in | -6.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.5 in | 64.4 in | -9.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.3 in | 0 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 39.2 in | -0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.4 in | 65.2 in | -8.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.1 in | 60.6 in | -7.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 39.0 in | -0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.9 in | -37.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 61.7 in | -61.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 49.1 in | -49.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 25.6 in | -25.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.6 in (over 2 rows) | 105.9 in (over 3 rows) | -26.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 37.2 ft3 | 16.9 ft3 | 20.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 37.2 | 60.3 ft3 | -23.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 70.9 ft3 | 108.9 ft3 | -38 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda CR-V
| 2012 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Though a column-mounted shifter and a minivan-like walk through to the second row went away with the third-generation CR-V, Honda's compact crossover retains an interior that puts roominess and functionality ahead of sportiness. Thanks to an open design with a relatively compact instrument panel and center console, both rows feel even roomier than the class-leading (or close to it) specs suggest. Though the second-row seat is mounted too low to provide adults with much thigh support, the floor back there remains hump-free. see full Honda CR-V review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda CR-V
| 2012 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Front seats very comfortable and roomy. They almost appear too wide, and I wish they had more lateral support. Very useable center console with a flat top. see full Honda CR-V review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
I sometimes have elderly passengers. They do not have to squirm to get in or do calesthenics to get out. see full Honda CR-V review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
