| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Honda CR-V and 2016 Honda Pilot Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Honda CR-V | Honda Pilot | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,619 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,554 mm | 4,940 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,819 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,773 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,537 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 58 L | 74 L | -16 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 1,021 mm | 979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 975 mm | 3 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 988 mm | -988 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,463 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,133 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 810 mm | -810 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,027 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,011 L | 467 L | -466 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 35.7 | 1,325 L | 34.7 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,064 L | 2,376 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda CR-V
| 2010 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
I sometimes have elderly passengers. They do not have to squirm to get in or do calesthenics to get out. see full Honda CR-V review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
The caravan style arm rests are ugly but extremely comfortable. see full Honda CR-V review |
| 2010 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
Could not find a comfortable position, even with a power seat. see full Honda CR-V review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot
| 2016 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
