Model Year | 2012 | 2012 | |
Model | Honda CR-Z | Volvo XC90 | |
Engine | 1.5L I4 Hybrid OHC-4v 122 hp@6000 123 lb-ft@1000 |
3.2L I6 DOHC-4v 240 hp@6200 236 lb-ft@3200 |
|
Transmission | 7-speed shiftable CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 95.9 in | 112.6 in | -16.7 in |
Length | 160.6 in | 188.9 in | -28.3 in |
Width | 68.5 in | 74.7 in | -6.2 in |
Height | 54.9 in | 70.2 in | -15.3 in |
Curb Weight | 2690 lb. | 4544 lb. | -1854 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 21.1 gal. | -10.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 36.9 in | 39.7 in | -2.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.8 in | 58.3 in | -4.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 55.4 in | -3.9 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 41.0 in | 1.7 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 38.4 in | -38.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 57.4 in | -57.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 54.1 in | -54.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 34.6 in | -34.6 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.5 in | -35.5 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 30.1 in | -30.1 in |
Total Legroom | 42.7 in (over 1 rows) | 105.7 in (over 3 rows) | -63 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 25.1 ft3 | 8.8 ft3 | 16.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.1 | 43.3 ft3 | -18.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 25.1 ft3 | 85.1 ft3 | -60 ft3 |
2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |
2012 Volvo XC90 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 311-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
In an effort to make room for the third seat, the leg room up front has been compromised see full Volvo XC90 review |