Model Year | 2012 | 2012 | |
Model | Honda CR-Z | Volvo XC90 | |
Engine | 1.5L I4 Hybrid OHC-4v 91 kW@6000 167 Nm@1000 |
3.2L I6 DOHC-4v 179 kW@6200 320 Nm@3200 |
|
Transmission | 7-speed shiftable CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,436 mm | 2,860 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,079 mm | 4,798 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,740 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,394 mm | 1,783 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,220 kg | 2,061 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 80 L | -40 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 937 mm | 1,008 mm | 936 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,085 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 975 mm | -975 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,458 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,374 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 879 mm | -879 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 902 mm | -902 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 765 mm | -765 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 2,685 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 711 L | 249 L | 462 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.1 | 1,226 L | 24.1 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 25.1 | 2,410 L | 23.1 |
2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |
2012 Volvo XC90 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 311-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
In an effort to make room for the third seat, the leg room up front has been compromised see full Volvo XC90 review |