| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda Civic and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2016 | |
| Model | Honda Civic | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | 2.4L I4 DOHC-4v 201 hp@7000 170 lb-ft@4400 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 355 hp@5600 383 lb-ft@4100 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 116.0 in | -10.9 in |
| Length | 177.3 in | 204.0 in | -26.7 in |
| Width | 69.0 in | 80.5 in | -11.5 in |
| Height | 56.5 in | 74.4 in | -17.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 2906 lb. | 5466 lb. | -2560 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -12.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.0 in | 42.8 in | -3.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 64.8 in | -8.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 50.5 in | 60.8 in | -10.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 45.3 in | -3.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.1 in | 38.7 in | -1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.3 in | 65.1 in | -11.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.4 in | 60.3 in | -8.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.2 in | 39.0 in | -2.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.1 in | -38.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 62.6 in | -62.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 49.3 in | -49.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 24.8 in | -24.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.2 in (over 2 rows) | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | -30.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.5 ft3 | 15.3 ft3 | -2.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 12.5 | 51.6 ft3 | -39.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.5 ft3 | 94.7 ft3 | -82.2 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Civic
| 2012 Honda Civic Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Interior dimensions haven't changed, so the 2013 Civic continues to have one of the segment's roomiest rear seats (though not in the same league as the VW Jetta). A barely there floor hump and a broad cushy center seat render the Civic more capable than most compact sedans of seating three adults, though the rear cushion is somewhat low and hip room is in short supply. You'll find more shoulder room but less rear legroom in the Dart's back seat. Midsize sedans often don't offer much more rear legroom, but their seats tend to be more comfortably positioned. see full Honda Civic review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Civic
| 2012 Honda Civic Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 197-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The seats fit me perfectly. see full Honda Civic review |
| 2012 Honda Civic Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat was a bit tight for adults, in hindsight we should have bought the Accord. see full Honda Civic review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
