| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Honda Fit and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2016 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 99.6 in | 107.1 in | -7.5 in |
| Length | 160.0 in | 188.3 in | -28.3 in |
| Width | 67.0 in | 75.4 in | -8.4 in |
| Height | 60.0 in | 54.4 in | 5.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 2513 lb. | 3526 lb. | -1013 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -5.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.5 in | 37.6 in | 1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.8 in | 56.3 in | -1.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 54.9 in | -3.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.4 in | 42.0 in | -0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.5 in | 34.8 in | 2.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.6 in | 52.2 in | 0.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 45.1 in | 47.4 in | -2.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 30.6 in | 8.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 80.7 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 8.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.6 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 3.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 52.7 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 39.2 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
| 2016 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The new Honda Fit's first row has a a few more inches of elbow room than those in the Versa Note and Fiesta. Consequently, it feels like a larger car--unless you also need leg room. Then it's no better than the Nissan. Drivers with long legs will wish the front seat could slide back farther--but this would cramp the magic style of the rear seat. Even drivers of middling height (e.g. me) might find the driver seat uncomfortable. The headrest and non-adjustable lumbar bulge both jut well forward. Depending on your personal size and shape, this might or might not be an issue. Pay close attention before you buy. see full Honda Fit review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
