| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Honda Fit and 2016 Honda Pilot Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Honda Pilot | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,499 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,105 mm | 4,940 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,524 mm | 1,773 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,132 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 74 L | -34 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,021 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 975 mm | -99 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 988 mm | -988 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,463 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,133 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 810 mm | -810 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 583 L | 467 L | 116 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 1,325 L | 19.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,623 L | 2,376 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot
| 2016 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
