Model Year | 2016 | 2003 | |
Model | Honda Fit | Mazda Mazda6 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2016 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The new Honda Fit's first row has a a few more inches of elbow room than those in the Versa Note and Fiesta. Consequently, it feels like a larger car--unless you also need leg room. Then it's no better than the Nissan. Drivers with long legs will wish the front seat could slide back farther--but this would cramp the magic style of the rear seat. Even drivers of middling height (e.g. me) might find the driver seat uncomfortable. The headrest and non-adjustable lumbar bulge both jut well forward. Depending on your personal size and shape, this might or might not be an issue. Pay close attention before you buy. see full Honda Fit review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit.
2003 Mazda Mazda6 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I don't find it a very comfortable car for trips over about an hour. see full Mazda Mazda6 review |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 4-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Not big enough across for three small children. Less legroom than my 1994 Honda Accord, which was about the same size overall. see full Mazda Mazda6 review |