| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda Fit and 2014 Toyota Sienna Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2014 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Toyota Sienna | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,499 mm | 3,030 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,105 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 1,986 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,524 mm | 1,750 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,132 kg | 1,955 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 76 L | -36 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,651 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,008 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,641 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 955 mm | -79 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 973 mm | -973 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,552 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,278 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,906 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 583 L | 1,107 L | 582 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 2,466 L | 18.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,623 L | 4,248 L | -3 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Toyota Sienna
| 2014 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Toyota Sienna
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Toyota Sienna.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
