| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda Fit and 2011 Volkswagen Eos Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2011 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Volkswagen Eos | |
| Engine | 1.5L I4 OHC-4v 117 hp@6600 106 lb-ft@4800 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 200 hp@5100 207 lb-ft@1800 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed manual | 6-speed automated manual | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 2dr Hardtop conv. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,499 mm | 2,578 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,105 mm | 4,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 1,791 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,524 mm | 1,443 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,132 kg | 1,610 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L | 55 L | -15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 953 mm | -952 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 909 mm | 82 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 1,054 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,303 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 826 mm | 50 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,885 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 583 L | 187 L | 396 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,623 L | 297 L | -296 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volkswagen Eos
| 2011 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
The back seat is not comfortable and has limited leg room. While the latter may be typical of some convertibles, leg room is less than on previous convertibles I have owned. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
