| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Honda Fit and 2009 Volvo C30 Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2009 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Volvo C30 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 2dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 98.4 in | 103.9 in | -5.5 in |
| Length | 161.6 in | 167.4 in | -5.8 in |
| Width | 66.7 in | 70.2 in | -3.5 in |
| Height | 60.0 in | 57.0 in | 3 in |
| Curb Weight | 2496 lb. | 3201 lb. | -705 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 15.9 gal. | -5.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 38.2 in | 2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.7 in | 53.6 in | -0.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 53.1 in | -1.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 42.3 in | -1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 36.4 in | 2.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 47.0 in | 4.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 41.5 in | 9.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.5 in | 33.9 in | 0.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 76.2 in (over 2 rows) | -0.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.6 ft3 | 12.9 ft3 | 7.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 57.3 ft3 | 20.2 ft3 | 37.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Volvo C30
| 2009 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I tested both the Mini Cooper and Volvo C30. The C30, by far, is the most comfortable and easy to find a great driving position. Driving from Los Angeles to San Francisco without any back or shoulder fatigue! see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I have sat in the seat for three plus hours with no discomfort. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2009 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seats are a bit short on leg room. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat room is tight, this is a small hatch coupe afterall. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seat is really make for children and not adults see full Volvo C30 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
