Honda HR-V vs. Suzuki XL7 Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 3 fuel economy reports for the Honda HR-V and 11 fuel economy reports for the Suzuki XL7.

Honda HR-V L/100km

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	L/100km
2016	4dr SUV 141-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT AWD	hills	med	light	0	55	0	45	60	7.5
2016	4dr SUV 141-horsepower 1.8L I4 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD	flat	light	none	0	20	80	0	0	6.9
2016	4dr SUV 141-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD	hills	light	none	0	0	50	50	65	6.6

This page shows only averages. See all the Honda HR-V fuel economy data.

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	L/100km
2007	4dr SUV 252-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	light	hvy	14	36	40	10	68	13.2
2007	4dr SUV 252-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	light	none	3	18	38	41	65	12.8
2003	4dr SUV, ext. 183-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	none	0	30	70	0	0	13.0
2002	4dr SUV, ext. 183-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	hvy	0	20	20	60	70	10.7

This page shows only averages. See all the Suzuki XL7 fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models and Suzuki models.

Honda HR-V Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2016	With EPA ratings of 28 mpg city and 35 mpg highway, the front-wheel-drive Honda HR-V nearly leads the class in fuel economy; that honor goes to the Mazda CX-3, with 29/35. Add all-wheel drive and they tie with 27/32. The Trax trails by a 2-3 mpg in the city and a single mpg on the highway. In my real-world driving, though, the Chevrolet's trip computer reported better numbers than the Honda's. Was it accurate? I don't know. But if it was, the Trax was a little more efficient in my suburban driving, 37 mpg vs. 35 mpg, and considerably more efficient in my highway driving, 40 vs. 34 mpg. Granted, that the tested Trax lacked all-wheel drive could explain the observed difference in suburban mpg, if not the larger one in highway mpg. It should also be noted that the Trax's fuel efficiency is more dependent on driving style. Employ a heavy foot, and the tiny four's turbo will shove far more fuel-air mixture into the cylinders. Since the EPA figures aren't terribly far apart and the trips computers cast some doubt on their accuracy, I've judged this category a tie. Drive either CUV casually, and you'll enjoy fuel economy well beyond the reach of most cars. see full Honda HR-V review

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Honda HR-V.

Suzuki XL7 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr SUV 252-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD	Family went on a 400 miles round trip and averaged just slightly higher than 24 mpg. (Note: I am a conservative driver. I am happy to use the right hand lane for my trips. see full Suzuki XL7 review

Suzuki XL7 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2002	4dr SUV, ext. 183-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	For how small and light weight (relatively speaking) it is, the fuel economy is dismal, around 17 mpg city real world. That is down near full/mid sized pickup territory. see full Suzuki XL7 review