| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Honda Odyssey and 2015 Lincoln MKC Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
| Model | Honda Odyssey | Lincoln MKC | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 118.1 in | 105.9 in | 12.2 in |
| Length | 202.1 in | 179.2 in | 22.9 in |
| Width | 77.1 in | 73.4 in | 3.7 in |
| Height | 68.8 in | 65.2 in | 3.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 4385 lb. | 3791 lb. | 594 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.0 gal. | 15.5 gal. | 5.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 39.6 in | 1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.5 in | 56.0 in | 7.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.0 in | 54.4 in | 2.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 40.8 in | 0 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.0 in | 38.7 in | 1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 63.1 in | 55.3 in | 7.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 64.4 in | 52.8 in | 11.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 40.0 in | 36.8 in | 3.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 38.4 in | 0.0 in | 38.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.2 in | 0.0 in | 61.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.5 in | 0.0 in | 48.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 41.1 in | 0.0 in | 41.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 121.9 in (over 3 rows) | 77.6 in (over 2 rows) | 44.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 38.4 ft3 | 25.2 ft3 | 13.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 91.1 ft3 | 25.2 | 65.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 147.4 ft3 | 53.1 ft3 | 94.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda Odyssey
| 2010 Honda Odyssey Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 247-horsepower 3.5L V6 w/DoD 5-speed automatic FWD |
The Odyssey has the best seat setup of any minivan on the market, by a large margin. Standard 8th seat, which is usable, easy to flip the 3rd row, adjustable 2nd row without floor rails to collect debris from kiddos. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 247-horsepower 3.5L V6 w/DoD 6-speed automatic FWD |
Nice and roomy 2nd row, we really like the Wide mode seating. Very nice 3rd row usable by adults. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2009 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 244-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Absolutely no complaints here. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2009 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 244-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
No complaints for the second row. Have never sat in the third row. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2010 Honda Odyssey Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 247-horsepower 3.5L V6 w/DoD 5-speed automatic FWD |
The seats are still more thinly padded than the competition - and the third row seat angle is merely adequate. My mother in law noted that our Ody 3rd row is really like a standard seat - not "3rd class" - but the Pacifica made her feel like she was "stuck in the back". see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2010 | 0 | Just acceptable. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2010 | 0 | These seats kill both my wife and my back on long trips. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2009 | 0 | Why can't manufacturers make the passenger seat as comfortable with as many adjustments as the driver's side? see full Honda Odyssey review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC
| 2015 Lincoln MKC Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Seat comfort can be highly subjective, partly because human bodies come in many different shapes and sizes. This said, the MKC's driver seat fit me like a glove from the moment I first sat down. The seat bottom is cushier than most, including those in the Acura and Audi, while the seatback is very well contoured. You'll find more lateral support in the Acura, but the Lincoln's seats offer as much as owners are likely to need in a compact crossover. The view forward from this seat is better than in the Ford Escape, as the MKC's windshield doesn't seem as steeply raked and doesn't have oddly curved, fishbowl-effect lower corners. Also, the top of the Lincoln's instrument panel better disguises its considerable depth. The instrument panels in the Acura and in German competitors require no such artful disguising, as they aren't nearly as deep. To the rear, the MKC's windows are at least as small as the Escape's, and smaller than the Acura's and the Audi's. Luckily the side mirrors are large and blind spot warning is an option. see full Lincoln MKC review | |
| 2015 Lincoln MKC Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the Lincoln MKC's key weakness is at least as apparent as any of its strengths once one moves beyond the official specs--likely cheated, per Ford's recent practice--and actually sits in its rear seat. The Escape is tighter than most back there, and the MKC is tighter still. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees come within a couple inches of the front seatbacks. Put a tall driver up front, and I wouldn't fit in back. Nearly all competitors have roomier rear seats. You'll find far more shoulder room and rear knee room in the RDX. Perhaps Lincoln should have stretched the MKC's wheelbase a few inches to expand the rear seat. As is, it's about four inches shorter than the RDX, Q5, and Volvo XC60. A roofline an inch lower than the Escape's might improve the exterior's proportions, but it cuts into interior space. see full Lincoln MKC review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
