| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Honda Odyssey and 2017 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2017 | |
| Model | Honda Odyssey | Toyota Prius | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,000 mm | 2,700 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,133 mm | 4,539 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,958 mm | 1,760 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,748 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,989 kg | 1,395 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 43 L | 36 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,613 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,448 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 950 mm | -949 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,603 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,636 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 848 mm | -847 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 975 mm | 0 mm | 975 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,554 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,232 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 1,044 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Total Legroom | 3,096 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 2 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,087 L | 697 L | -696 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,580 L | 24.6 | -22.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,174 L | 1,775 L | 3 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Honda Odyssey
| 2009 Honda Odyssey Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 244-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Absolutely no complaints here. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2009 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 244-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
No complaints for the second row. Have never sat in the third row. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 241-horsepower 3.5L V6 w/DoD 5-speed automatic FWD |
Needed comfortable front seats for a large dad (@230) pounds and a tiny grandfather (@95 pounds, 4feet, 5 inches tall). These seats are the best for the comfort of such various sizes. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 241-horsepower 3.5L V6 w/DoD 5-speed automatic FWD |
Comfortable and roomy for adults and children alike. Wonderful for those long road trip to disney with the entire family. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2009 Honda Odyssey Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 0 | Just acceptable. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2010 | 0 | These seats kill both my wife and my back on long trips. see full Honda Odyssey review |
| 2009 | 0 | Why can't manufacturers make the passenger seat as comfortable with as many adjustments as the driver's side? see full Honda Odyssey review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
