Model Year | 2016 | 2013 | |
Model | Honda Pilot | Lincoln MKZ | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 280 hp@6000 262 lb-ft@4700 |
3.7L V6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@6500 270 lb-ft@4000 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,940 mm | 4,930 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,996 mm | 1,864 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,773 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,919 kg | 1,815 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 74 L | 62 L | 12 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,019 mm | 963 mm | -962 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,021 mm | 930 mm | -929 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,575 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,455 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 940 mm | 35 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 988 mm | 0 mm | 988 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,133 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 810 mm | 0 mm | 810 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 467 L | 436 L | 31 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,325 L | 15.4 | -14.4 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,376 L | 15.4 | -13.4 L |
2016 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot.
2013 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2013 | Seat evaluations are highly subjective. For me, the MKZ's standard front seats are very good, but short of outstanding. Compared to the seats in the Fusion, they're more firmly contoured but have smaller side bolsters. The optional multi-contour seats might address the bolster deficit. But few people are going to drive this car in a manner that requires much lateral support. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
2013 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Ford Fusion. In the Lincoln MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
2013 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
I love driving in luxury, and this car delivers much of it. From the cooled/heated seats to the delicious feel of the leather seating surfaces, this car offers more than adequate comfort...and it is a luxury automobile after all. I would expect no less from Lincoln. see full Lincoln MKZ review |