Honda Ridgeline (2010) vs. BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo (2014) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Honda Ridgeline and 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo specs.
2010 Honda Ridgeline and 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo Specifications
Model Year |
2010 |
2014 |
|
Model |
Honda Ridgeline |
BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUT |
4dr Hatch |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
122.0 in |
115.0 in |
7 in |
Length |
206.8 in |
190.0 in |
16.8 in |
Width |
76.3 in |
72.0 in |
4.3 in |
Height |
70.3 in |
59.4 in |
10.9 in |
Curb Weight |
4503 lb. |
3915 lb. |
588 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
22.0 gal. |
15.8 gal. |
6.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
40.7 in |
41.3 in |
-0.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
63.2 in |
55.2 in |
8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
57.6 in |
0.0 in |
57.6 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
40.8 in |
42.0 in |
-1.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.1 in |
38.3 in |
0.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
62.6 in |
54.1 in |
8.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
57.2 in |
0.0 in |
57.2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
36.4 in |
39.2 in |
-2.8 in |
Total Legroom |
77.2 in (over 2 rows) |
81.2 in (over 2 rows) |
-4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
0.0 |
18.3 ft3 |
-18.3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
0.0 |
18.4 ft3 |
-18.4 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
0.0 |
56.5 ft3 |
-56.5 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda Ridgeline
2010 |
4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy.
see full Honda Ridgeline review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
2014 |
Though the latest 3-Series has a much roomier back seat than its predecessors, many people still find it insufficient for their needs, and step up to a midsize sedan or wagon such as the 5-Series or E-Class. Well, most of the 3-Series Gran Turismo's wheelbase stretch was put towards rear seat legroom, bumping it from 35.0 to 37.9 inches. Though a larger car, the E-Class has nearly four inches less total legroom--barely more than the 3 wagon, in fact. (But with a more comfortably positioned rear seat than the 3 wagon.)
What the specs don't tell you is that the 3 GT's rear seat cushion, since it is positioned much higher than that in the wagons, provides better thigh support and a much more open view forward. To top it off, the 3 GT's rear seat back reclines.
Here again, though, the E-Class wagon has a trick bonus: a rear-facing third-row seat. Though there's not enough headroom back there for anyone over 5-4, the seat is well-padded. If you want to seat seven in a pinch, the E-Class wagon is your only option with a sedan-like driving position (aside from the Tesla Model S).
Update: this review originally stated that the 3GT has much more shoulder room than the regular 3-Series, and about as much as the E-Class. But it seems that the initial specs were inaccurate. The latest specs suggest shoulder room in the 3GT is about the same as that in the regular 3-Series. Its interior does feel significantly roomier, though, so the initial specs could yet provide the more accurate set.
see full BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Honda models.