| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Honda Ridgeline and 2014 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
| Model | Honda Ridgeline | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 250 hp@5700 247 lb-ft@4300 |
6.2L V8 OHV-2v 415 hp@5900 415 lb-ft@4600 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUT | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 122.0 in | 114.8 in | 7.2 in |
| Length | 206.8 in | 195.5 in | 11.3 in |
| Width | 76.3 in | 74.7 in | 1.6 in |
| Height | 70.3 in | 57.9 in | 12.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4503 lb. | 3975 lb. | 528 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 19.0 gal. | 3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.7 in | 38.7 in | 2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.2 in | 59.1 in | 4.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 57.2 in | 0.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 42.3 in | -1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.1 in | 38.0 in | 1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 62.6 in | 59.0 in | 3.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 58.0 in | -0.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.4 in | 39.7 in | -3.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | -4.8 in |
| Cargo Volume | 0.0 | 16.4 ft3 | -16.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Honda Ridgeline
| 2011 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
