| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Honda Ridgeline and 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2010 | |
| Model | Honda Ridgeline | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUT | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,099 mm | 2,761 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,253 mm | 4,630 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,938 mm | 1,770 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,786 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,043 kg | 1,600 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 66 L | 17 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 942 mm | -941 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,605 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,463 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 937 mm | 56 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,590 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,453 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 848 mm | 77 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,908 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 0.0 | 351 L | -351 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Honda Ridgeline
| 2011 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
