| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Honda Ridgeline and 2013 Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Honda Ridgeline | ||
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda Ridgeline
| 2010 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013
| 2013 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The CLA's rear legroom stat, a very low 27.1 inches, suggests that adults won't even fit in back. But this stat under-represents reality. At 5-9, I could just manage to site behind myself. More than the limited amount of room, I minded the highly constricted view out. The coupe-like roof line takes a big cut out of the rear side windows. Unlike in the C-Class, the front seats largely block rear seat passengers' view forward. Suffer from claustrophobia? Best avoid the CLA. But, it's a coupe, so what did you expect? see full review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 .
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
