Model Year | 2012 | 2014 | |
Model | Honda Ridgeline | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 186 kW@5700 335 Nm@4300 |
3.0L V6 OHC-4v 167 kW@6250 291 Nm@3750 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUT | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,099 mm | 2,670 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,253 mm | 4,656 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,938 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,786 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,043 kg | 1,620 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 63 L | 20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,605 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,463 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 975 mm | 18 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,590 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,453 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 947 mm | -22 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 907 mm | -907 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,285 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,001 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 716 mm | -716 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 0.0 | 292 L | -292 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 0.0 | 968 L | -968 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 0.0 | 1,792 L | -1 |
2012 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander.