| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Honda Ridgeline and 2016 Subaru Forester Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | Honda Ridgeline | Subaru Forester | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUT | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 122.0 in | 103.9 in | 18.1 in |
| Length | 206.8 in | 180.9 in | 25.9 in |
| Width | 76.3 in | 70.7 in | 5.6 in |
| Height | 70.3 in | 66.4 in | 3.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 4503 lb. | 3296 lb. | 1207 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 15.9 gal. | 6.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.7 in | 41.4 in | -0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.2 in | 57.0 in | 6.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 0.0 in | 57.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 43.0 in | -2.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.1 in | 39.8 in | -0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 62.6 in | 56.5 in | 6.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 0.0 in | 57.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.4 in | 38.0 in | -1.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 81 in (over 2 rows) | -3.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 0.0 | 34.4 ft3 | -34.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 0.0 | 74.7 ft3 | -74.7 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Honda Ridgeline
| 2011 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Forester
| 2016 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
I'm 6'3" and often don't fit comfortable in vehicles. I found this had a very nice amount of front seat room. The center console tends to stay out of the way as well, some newer designs have the center stack moving into where my right knee would be. It's a very noticeable improvement over my previous 2009 Escape. I actually found the Forester more comfortable for me than the Outback. I was expecting the opposite. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
After looking at Explorer's, I was surprised how much more room the Forester had in the back seat. Granted it doesn't have a third row, but if you don't need a 3rd row, the Forester is hard to beat in this segment for rear seat room. We can put a forward facing child seat in the back, move the front seat up a about 2 inches from all the way back and there's still plenty of front passenger room and my 1.5 year old son can't kick the back of the seat. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2016 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 250hp 2.0L H4 8-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
- Terrible front seat support - The cushions are too short - It's not noticeable on a test drive right away. I would not have bought the car! Test drive extensively! - Surfaces where your elbows would lay are too hard - I purchased foam pads to make it feel better. - Tall drivers like myself will struggle with the telescoping wheel's short extension range. - It is hard to get into a fully comfortable driving position. The memory seats in the XT help somewhat by retaining your seat settings if moved. - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this twice - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this THREE times! Subaru are you listening? The front seat cushions are WAY TOO SHORT! see full Subaru Forester review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
