| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Honda Ridgeline and 2012 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Honda Ridgeline | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 250 hp@5700 247 lb-ft@4300 |
2.4L I4 DOHC-4v 158 hp@6000 162 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 5-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUT | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 122.0 in | 102.4 in | 19.6 in |
| Length | 206.8 in | 171.9 in | 34.9 in |
| Width | 76.3 in | 69.5 in | 6.8 in |
| Height | 70.3 in | 61.4 in | 8.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 4503 lb. | 3065 lb. | 1438 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 8.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.7 in | 40.5 in | 0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.2 in | 53.3 in | 9.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 52.3 in | 5.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 41.6 in | -0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.1 in | 39.3 in | -0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 62.6 in | 52.6 in | 10 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 43.7 in | 13.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.4 in | 36.2 in | 0.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | -0.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 0.0 | 19.8 ft3 | -19.8 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 0.0 | 61.5 ft3 | -61.5 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda Ridgeline
| 2010 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota Matrix
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
