| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda Ridgeline and 2017 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2017 | |
| Model | Honda Ridgeline | Toyota Prius | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 186 kW@5700 335 Nm@4300 |
1.8L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 71 kW@5200 142 Nm@3600 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | CVT | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUT | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,099 mm | 2,700 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,253 mm | 4,539 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,938 mm | 1,760 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,786 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,043 kg | 1,395 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 43 L | 40 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,605 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,463 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 950 mm | 43 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,590 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,453 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 848 mm | 77 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 0.0 | 697 L | -697 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 0.0 | 1,775 L | -1 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Ridgeline
| 2012 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
