2013 Toyota Tundra Toyota Tundra 2009

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

(2013) vs. Toyota Tundra (2009) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 and 2009 Toyota Tundra specs.

2013 and 2009 Toyota Tundra Specifications

Model Year 2013 2009  
Model Toyota Tundra  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013

2013 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2014 Like the G37, the Q50 has one of the roomiest rear seats among BMW 3-Series challengers. On paper it offers the most combined rear legroom, 44.5 inches in the front seat and 35.1 inches in back, about 2.5 more than the BMW and Lexus. But the difference doesn't seem as large as this number suggests. The Audi S4 and Cadillac ATS remain more cramped. The Q50 doesn't come by its extra room through brilliant packaging. Instead, at 188 inches it's about a half-foot longer than a 3-Series or ATS. see full review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 .

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota Tundra

2009 Toyota Tundra Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 381-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Lots of room for my long legs and seat is comfortable for the long haul. see full Toyota Tundra review
2010 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 381-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
With the front seat back and back seat forward, still have knee room. The recline on the back seat is great. see full Toyota Tundra review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Infiniti models.