| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Jaguar XJ and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Jaguar XJ | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | supercharged 5.0L V8 DOHC-4v 510 hp@6000 461 lb-ft@2500 |
5.2L V8 DOHC-4v 526 hp@7500 429 lb-ft@4750 |
|
| Transmission | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 119.4 in | 107.1 in | 12.3 in |
| Length | 201.7 in | 188.3 in | 13.4 in |
| Width | 74.6 in | 75.4 in | -0.8 in |
| Height | 57.0 in | 54.4 in | 2.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 4123 lb. | 3705 lb. | 418 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.7 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 5.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.4 in | 37.6 in | 0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.3 in | 56.3 in | 2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 58.3 in | 54.9 in | 3.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.5 in | 42.0 in | -0.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 34.8 in | 3.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.2 in | 52.2 in | 6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.3 in | 47.4 in | 10.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.9 in | 30.6 in | 8.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 80.4 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 7.8 in |
| Cargo Volume | 15.2 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 1.7 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Jaguar XJ
| 2013 Jaguar XJ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | This sporty, tailored theme continues with the shape of the 20-way-adjustable front seats. The A8's seats have even more adjustments, yet no matter how much you fiddle with them aren't nearly as form-fitting or as cosseting. The XJ's more precisely shaped, cushy (yet not at all mushy) buckets seem much more tailored to the human form. The space between their modestly sized but firm bolsters can be adjusted to provide more lateral support when this is called for. The only noteworthy shortcoming of the XJ's front seats: though the headrests can be manually adjusted fore-and-aft, even in their most rearward position these press a bit much against the back of my head. Your physique and experience may vary. The rear seats are similarly form-fitting, but without a center console to rob space. see full Jaguar XJ review | |
| 2013 Jaguar XJ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| As mentioned when discussing the driving position, the XJ's front seat doesn't feel nearly as roomy as those in the Audi and BMW. But it also feels sportier. What's your priority? see full Jaguar XJ review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Jaguar XJ
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Jaguar XJ.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Jaguar models.
