| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 and 2011 Volkswagen Eos Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2011 | |
| Model | Volkswagen Eos | ||
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013
| 2013 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The GMC Terrain and Subaru Forester have roomy rear seats, but no vents to keep people back there cool. The Ford Escape has rear air vents, but a much less roomy rear seat. The Jeep Cherokee has a roomy, comfortably high rear seat AND rear air vents. see full review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 .
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volkswagen Eos
| 2011 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
The back seat is not comfortable and has limited leg room. While the latter may be typical of some convertibles, leg room is less than on previous convertibles I have owned. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
