Jeep Grand Cherokee Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2003

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Jeep Grand Cherokee (2010) vs. Ford Mustang (2003) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2003 Ford Mustang specs.

2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2003 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year 2010 2003  
Model Jeep Grand Cherokee Ford Mustang  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee

2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review
2011 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review
2011 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review
2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang

2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor. see full Ford Mustang review
2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats. But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker. see full Ford Mustang review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.