| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2015 Lincoln MKZ Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2015 | |
| Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Lincoln MKZ | |
| Engine | 6.1L V8 OHV-2v 420 hp@6200 420 lb-ft@4800 |
3.7L V6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@6500 270 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.5 in | 112.2 in | -2.7 in |
| Length | 186.6 in | 194.1 in | -7.5 in |
| Width | 73.3 in | 73.4 in | -0.1 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 58.2 in | 9.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 4788 lb. | 4002 lb. | 786 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.8 gal. | 16.5 gal. | 4.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 37.9 in | 1.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 57.7 in | 1.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 55.1 in | 2.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 41.8 in | -0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 36.6 in | 2.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.5 in | 55.3 in | 3.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 53.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.5 in | 37.0 in | -1.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | -1.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 34.5 ft3 | 15.4 ft3 | 19.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 67.4 ft3 | 15.4 ft3 | 52 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 215hp 3.0L V6 Diesel 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
small, tight see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
That and MPG are the only real faults so far after 15000 miles and 15 mons. I think our 2001 GC has more seat comfort although the 07s seats do fold over easier than the 01s. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKZ
| 2015 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Ford Fusion. In the Lincoln MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKZ
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKZ.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
