Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Lincoln MKZ | |
Engine | 5.7L V8 OHV-2v 360 hp@5150 390 lb-ft@4250 |
3.7L V6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@6500 270 lb-ft@4000 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 114.8 in | 112.2 in | 2.6 in |
Length | 189.8 in | 194.1 in | -4.3 in |
Width | 76.3 in | 73.4 in | 2.9 in |
Height | 69.4 in | 58.2 in | 11.2 in |
Curb Weight | 4780 lb. | 4002 lb. | 778 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 24.6 gal. | 16.5 gal. | 8.1 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 37.9 in | 2.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.6 in | 57.7 in | 0.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.0 in | 55.1 in | 1.9 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 41.8 in | -1.5 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 36.6 in | 2.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.0 in | 55.3 in | 2.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.5 in | 53.8 in | 2.7 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 37.0 in | 1.6 in |
Total Legroom | 78.9 in (over 2 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 0.1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 36.3 ft3 | 15.4 ft3 | 20.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 68.3 ft3 | 15.4 ft3 | 52.9 ft3 |
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2015 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Ford Fusion. In the Lincoln MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKZ.