We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Jeep Renegade vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Chart is based on 114 fuel economy reports for the Jeep Renegade and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Jeep Renegade MPG

Jeep Renegade Jeep Renegade 2018 20.5 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Jeep Renegade Jeep Renegade 2015 31.5 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2018 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4
9-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light light 9 9 35 48 63 20.5  
2015 4dr SUV turbocharged 160hp 1.4L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat light none 3 7 43 47 63 31.5  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Jeep Renegade fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos MPG

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 30.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 35.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 23.8 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 21.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 30.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 31.0  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 28.1  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 28.8  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 27.1  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 35.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD
hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 23.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Jeep Renegade vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Jeep Renegade and Volkswagen Eos's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models and Volkswagen models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Jeep Renegade

Jeep Renegade Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Given the Jeep Renegade's far-from-aero shape and relatively large, 2.4-liter engine, it should come as little surprise that, even with a nine-speed automatic transmission, its EPA ratings of 21 mpg city, 29 mpg highway are significantly lower than those for most competitors. The Cherokee, though 600 pounds heavier, earns the same ratings with the same power train. Opt for a turbocharged 1.4-liter engine and the six-speed manual it is paired with, and the Renegade's ratings improve to 24/31 (with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive). The 2.4 with front-wheel drive manages 22/31. In comparison, when fitted with an automatic transmission and all-wheel drive the Chevrolet Trax achieves 24/31, the HR-V 27/32. and the Subaru Crosstrek 26/34. In my real-world suburban driving the Renegade's trip computer reported averages ranging from 19 to 25 mpg, and usually towards the lower end of this range. The Trax's trip computer on the same roads (but with warmer temps) reported averages between 30 and 40, and most often around 36-37. The Trax did not have all-wheel drive, but this shouldn't explain more than two-to-three mpg. The HR-V and CX-3, tested with all-wheel drive, tended to average about 35 and 33, respectively. The Renegade isn't in the same league. Some much larger SUVs have been better. see full Jeep Renegade review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Jeep Renegade

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Jeep Renegade.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD
On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review