| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Jeep Wrangler and 2012 Chevrolet Malibu Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Jeep Wrangler | Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 112.3 in | 3.7 in |
| Length | 184.4 in | 191.8 in | -7.4 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 70.3 in | 3.6 in |
| Height | 72.3 in | 57.1 in | 15.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 4180 lb. | 3415 lb. | 765 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.6 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 5.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 39.4 in | 1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.8 in | 55.9 in | -0.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.6 in | 53.0 in | 2.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 42.2 in | -1.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.3 in | 37.2 in | 3.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.8 in | 53.9 in | 2.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.7 in | 52.1 in | 4.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 37.6 in | -0.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.2 in (over 2 rows) | 79.8 in (over 2 rows) | -1.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 46.4 ft3 | 15.1 ft3 | 31.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 82.0 ft3 | 15.1 ft3 | 66.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Jeep Wrangler
| 2010 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 6-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range |
It is big enough that I can take three passengers in relative comfort, considering the type of vehicle that it is. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
| 2010 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
It has the ability to go back and forth but not tilt the base seat. Firm but not being able to adjust the angle (like electric 10 way) makes a difference for tall and full frame people. I will be looking to adjust angle asap. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
| 2012 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2012 | On paper, the Malibu's rear seat is only a little tighter than those in the 2008-2012 sedan and in competing cars. In person, rear knee room would only be marginally competitive in the compact sedan segment. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my shins graze the front seatbacks. GM is rushing some revised seats to market. But if past attempts to fix a cramped rear seat are any indication, this won't make a substantial difference. The rear seat in the Ford Fusion is roomier, if also short of the segment's quasi-limos. see full Chevrolet Malibu review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
| 2012 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Good legroom. Hip room is alittle tight in this year's Malibu. see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
| 2012 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
This is tight if front seats are postioned at or close to the back of their range; shorter wheelbase in this model compared to prior version. Rear seat access is excellent (i.e, for infant car seats, small item transport). see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I'm 6'4" tall and 60 years old. I have a tough time getting in and out due to the low roof. see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
drivers seat is hard on my back, no matter how much I adjust...seems to be missing some foam on left side bolster...taking into dealer for possible replacement of seat cushion soon see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
