| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Jeep Wrangler and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
| Model | Jeep Wrangler | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 107.1 in | 8.9 in |
| Length | 184.4 in | 188.3 in | -3.9 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 75.4 in | -1.5 in |
| Height | 72.3 in | 54.4 in | 17.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 4180 lb. | 3526 lb. | 654 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.6 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 5.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 37.6 in | 3.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.8 in | 56.3 in | -0.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.6 in | 54.9 in | 0.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 42.0 in | -1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.3 in | 34.8 in | 5.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.8 in | 52.2 in | 4.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.7 in | 47.4 in | 9.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 30.6 in | 6.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.2 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 5.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 46.4 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 32.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 82.0 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 68.5 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Jeep Wrangler
| 2010 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 6-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range |
It is big enough that I can take three passengers in relative comfort, considering the type of vehicle that it is. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
| 2010 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
It has the ability to go back and forth but not tilt the base seat. Firm but not being able to adjust the angle (like electric 10 way) makes a difference for tall and full frame people. I will be looking to adjust angle asap. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
