Kia Cadenza (2017) vs. Dodge Challenger (2012) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2017 Kia Cadenza and 2012 Dodge Challenger specs.
2017 Kia Cadenza and 2012 Dodge Challenger Specifications
Model Year |
2017 |
2012 |
|
Model |
Kia Cadenza |
Dodge Challenger |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Sedan |
2dr Coupe |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
112.4 in |
116.0 in |
-3.6 in |
Length |
195.7 in |
197.7 in |
-2 in |
Width |
73.6 in |
75.7 in |
-2.1 in |
Height |
57.9 in |
57.0 in |
0.9 in |
Curb Weight |
3633 lb. |
3719 lb. |
-86 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
18.5 gal. |
19.0 gal. |
-0.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
40.2 in |
39.5 in |
0.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
58.3 in |
58.2 in |
0.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
56.5 in |
54.7 in |
1.8 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
45.5 in |
42.0 in |
3.5 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
37.9 in |
37.4 in |
0.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
56.5 in |
53.9 in |
2.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
56.3 in |
51.4 in |
4.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
37.2 in |
32.6 in |
4.6 in |
Total Legroom |
82.7 in (over 2 rows) |
74.6 in (over 2 rows) |
8.1 in |
Cargo Volume |
16.0 ft3 |
16.2 ft3 |
-0.2 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Kia Cadenza
2017 |
Due to its shorter greenhouse and taller, more intrusive center console, the Buick's front row doesn't feel nearly as roomy as the Kia's, or even as roomy as the related Chevrolet Malibu's. Large sedans aren't what they used to be. While in the past they were both longer and wider than midsize sedans, these days they more often than not share platforms with the latter, and thus are not significantly wider, only longer. Even in the official specs the LaCrosse has nearly an inch less front shoulder room than the "smaller" Malibu.
Likewise, the Cadenza's front row dimensions are within fractions of an inch of the Optima's. If you're seeking more front seat room than in a midsize sedan, you won't find it in these cars. To be fair, midsize sedans have grown.
Both the Cadenza and LaCrosse have comfortable front seats, with the Buick's cushion perhaps slightly cushier. Take a turn aggressively, though, and you're much more likely to slide off the Buick's non-bucket, as it provides hardly any lateral support. The Cadenza's bolsters are more effective.
The payoff for the additional size of these largish sedans can be found in the back seat, where each offers about two inches more legroom than its junior partner. On paper, the Kia Cadenza offers only slightly more total legroom than the Buick LaCrosse. In reality, it offers much more. With the front seat positioned for my 30-inch inseam (I'm not long of leg), I had about ten inches of knee room in the Kia's back seat. The Kia's rear seat cushion is also a little more supportive and comfortable than the Buick's.
Not so good: in both cars there's not enough space under the front seats for the rear seat passengers' feet, essentially robbing them of about a half-foot of legroom. This design flaw is more the rule than the exception in upscale sedans. Still, it's not right.
see full Kia Cadenza review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Kia Cadenza
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Kia Cadenza.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Dodge Challenger
2013 |
2dr Coupe 375-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
I am a large person, being 6'4" tall and about 250 lbs. This car fits me great, with plenty of room and comfort. I am the driver always (I live alone) and don't often have anyone else with me, although on occasion, I have a passenger. Even with large passengers there is plenty of room in the interior. I have a couple of inches of head room, which is pretty unique. Most cars require me to recline the seat a notch or two in order to avoid having my head in the headliner. I DID NOT purchase a vehicle with a sunroof. That device eats up 2 inches of head room, and I would be right there. Besides, we get a lot of rain here on the coast and I would be afraid of leaks.
The seats are supportive, and I have the 6 way power driver's seat. It is easily adjustable for position and has the adjustable lumbar support. I cannot imagine anyone not being able to be comfortable. There is also plenty of leg room in the front seats. The back seats are useful in a pinch, but if I had a family, this would likely not be the best choice of vehicle for me. Although I love driving it, and looking at it!
see full Dodge Challenger review |
2012 Dodge Challenger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 |
2dr Coupe 372-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
While probably OK for short trips, but would not be comfortable for longer cruise even for small passengers
see full Dodge Challenger review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Kia models.