(2016) vs. Ford Mustang (2013) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 and 2013 Ford Mustang specs.
2016 and 2013 Ford Mustang Specifications
Model Year |
2016 |
2013 |
|
Model |
|
Ford Mustang |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016
2017 |
The Kia Niro's compact exterior dimensions somehow contain plentiful headroom and legroom in both rows. Beyond the measurements, the rear seat is positioned at an unusually comfortable height, affording both excellent leg support and an open view forward over the front seats.
see full review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 .
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
2013 |
2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather.
see full Ford Mustang review |
2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 |
2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips.
see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Kia models.