| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2018 Kia Niro and 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2018 | 2013 | |
| Model | Kia Niro | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,356 mm | 4,641 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,806 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,534 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,409 kg | 1,540 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L | 63 L | -18 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,019 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,422 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,364 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 973 mm | 20 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,227 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 935 mm | 15 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,265 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 993 mm | -993 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 704 mm | -704 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,009 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 549 L | 422 L | 127 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 19.4 | 1,025 L | 18.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,543 L | 2,056 L | -1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Kia Niro
| 2018 Kia Niro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2017 | The Kia Niro's compact exterior dimensions somehow contain plentiful headroom and legroom in both rows. Beyond the measurements, the rear seat is positioned at an unusually comfortable height, affording both excellent leg support and an open view forward over the front seats. see full Kia Niro review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Kia Niro
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Kia Niro.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Kia models.
