Model Year | 2012 | 2010 | |
Model | Kia Optima | Toyota Tacoma | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2012 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Kia Optima.
2010 Toyota Tacoma Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Crew Cab 6ft bed 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
This review site omits offering the Tacoma Access Cab body style, which is the style of our Tacoma. Read seating is very tight for adults, making use of seat belts almost impossible. Don't plan on using Access Cab rear seats for adults unless they are of diminutive stature. see full Toyota Tacoma review |
2009 | 4dr Crew Cab 5ft bed 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not quite big enough see full Toyota Tacoma review |