| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Kia Sedona and 2019 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2019 | |
| Model | Kia Sedona | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,725 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,131 mm | 4,630 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,989 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,760 mm | 1,661 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,990 kg | 1,564 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L | 56 L | 24 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,605 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,504 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,659 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,674 mm | 1,316 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,039 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 973 mm | 0 mm | 973 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,537 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,273 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 864 mm | 0 mm | 864 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,962 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 912 L | 838 L | 74 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,268 L | 29.6 | -27.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,007 L | 1,792 L | 3 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Kia Sedona
| 2006 Kia Sedona Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 250-horsepower 3.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Besides price, it was the rear seats/trunk area that sold me. see full Kia Sedona review |
| 2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 250-horsepower 3.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Fits handicapped son. see full Kia Sedona review |
| 2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 250-horsepower 3.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Room and comfort compared to the Sonata see full Kia Sedona review |
| 2006 Kia Sedona Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 250-horsepower 3.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The only thing that I would change is the fold down tray that sits between the front seats. (It is removable but I havent done that yey) see full Kia Sedona review |
| 2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 250-horsepower 3.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very uncomfortable getting to the 3rd row seats see full Kia Sedona review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain
| 2019 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Kia models.
