| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Kia Sorento and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Kia Sorento | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,671 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,885 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,709 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,635 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 75 L | 61 L | 14 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 996 mm | 955 mm | 41 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,506 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 884 mm | 112 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,420 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 777 mm | 178 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 932 mm | 0 mm | 932 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,367 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,128 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 795 mm | 0 mm | 795 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,799 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 258 L | 382 L | -124 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,048 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,053 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Kia Sorento
| 2013 Kia Sorento Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 276-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The Kia Sorento had very good seating positions in the front for a very tall person, I'm almost 6'5" and was able to fit with the sunroof / panaramic roof. You get a feeling of control and confidence. You do loose about 1" or so with the see full Kia Sorento review |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 276-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Very comfortable seats up front with tons of leg room. see full Kia Sorento review |
| 2013 Kia Sorento Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 276-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Needs an adjustable second row and a little more cargo room when the third row seat is up. see full Kia Sorento review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Kia models.
