Kia Soul Kia Soul 2013 Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2016

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Kia Soul (2013) vs. Ford Mustang (2016) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Kia Soul and 2016 Ford Mustang specs.

2013 Kia Soul and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year 2013 2016  
Model Kia Soul Ford Mustang  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 4dr Hatch 2dr Coupe  
      Difference
Wheelbase 2,550 mm 2,720 mm 0 mm
Length 4,120 mm 4,783 mm 0 mm
Width 1,786 mm 1,915 mm 0 mm
Height 1,610 mm 1,382 mm 0 mm
Curb Weight 1,186 kg 1,599 kg 0 kg
Fuel Capacity 48 L 61 L -13 L
Headroom, Row 1 1,021 mm 955 mm -954 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1 1,402 mm 1,430 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1 1,354 mm 1,394 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 1 1,069 mm 1,067 mm 0 mm
Headroom, Row 2 1,006 mm 884 mm -883 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2 1,400 mm 1,326 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2 1,339 mm 1,204 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 2 991 mm 777 mm 214 mm
Total Legroom 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) 1 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum 671 L 382 L 289 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum 1,512 L 13.5 -12.5 L

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Kia Soul

2013 Kia Soul Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
The seats are similarly sufficient for casual around-town driving but subpar for even moderate distances. Less than half way through our four-hour drive the hard, flat cushions grew uncomfortable. see full Kia Soul review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Kia Soul

2013 Kia Soul Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2014 0 Excellent room both up front and in the backseat for tall people. Same as previous model see full Kia Soul review
2013 Kia Soul Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2014 0 The front seat is every bit as uncomfortable as the previous model. No improvement here. A tall person will be more comfortable sitting in the rear seat. see full Kia Soul review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang

2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Kia models.