| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Land Rover LR3 and 2013 Dodge Durango Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2013 | |
| Model | Land Rover LR3 | Dodge Durango | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,885 mm | 3,043 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,849 mm | 5,075 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,892 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,630 kg | 2,157 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 86 L | 93 L | -7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,013 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,504 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,448 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,077 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,509 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,422 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 980 mm | -25 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 1,019 mm | 960 mm | -959 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,087 mm | 1,280 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,087 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 922 mm | 800 mm | 122 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,954 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,804 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 280 L | 487 L | -207 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,260 L | 1,351 L | 0 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,557 L | 2,393 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Land Rover LR3
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Land Rover LR3.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Dodge Durango
| 2013 Dodge Durango Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The Durango's relatively narrow width, a plus for handling, has the opposite impact on interior room. These are very much two sides of the same coin. Because the Durango's cabin isn't terribly wide it feels more agile than wider SUVs. But three passengers in the second row don't have as much space to spread out--those in a Nissan Pathfinder enjoy a couple more inches of shoulder room--and only two people can sit in the third row. (The Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, and GM's large crossovers all have three belts back there.) Leg room in the Durango is much more competitive, but still a few inches short of class leading. This said, comfort isn't only a matter of interior dimensions. Both of the Durango's rear rows are well-upholstered and positioned higher off the floor than the three-row crossover norm. This benefits both thigh support and outward visibility. The Hyundai Santa Fe isn't far off in this regard, but the Nissan Pathfinder's seats are much closer to the floor, and less hospitable to adults as a result. Among the three, I'd prefer to be a rear seat passenger in the Dodge. Among large conventional SUVs, the Ford Expedition has a more comfortable third row, but the Chevrolet Tahoe (which retains a live rear axle despite a comprehensive redesign for the 2015 model year) doesn't come close. And the foot-shorter 4Runner? Its XXS third-row seat is best saved for emergencies. On the other side of the ledger, the Durango does have a higher floor than the typical car-based crossover. Getting in and out isn't as easy. This vies with curb weight as the top disadvantage of the Durango's conventional SUV configuration. see full Dodge Durango review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Dodge Durango
| 2013 Dodge Durango Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
There was very little bolstering on the sides of the seat bottoms. I was not able to find a comfortable seating position in the Durango see full Dodge Durango review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
