Model Year | 2006 | 2013 | |
Model | Land Rover LR3 | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
Engine | 4.4L V8 DOHC-4v 300 hp@5500 315 lb-ft@4000 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD w/low range | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 113.6 in | 104.8 in | 8.8 in |
Length | 190.9 in | 171.5 in | 19.4 in |
Width | 75.4 in | 77.4 in | -2 in |
Height | 74.1 in | 64.4 in | 9.7 in |
Curb Weight | 5426 lb. | 3680 lb. | 1746 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 22.8 gal. | 18.5 gal. | 4.3 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 40.3 in | 0.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.2 in | 56.6 in | 2.6 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 43.1 in | -0.7 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 42.4 in | 39.7 in | 2.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.4 in | 55.4 in | 4 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 35.7 in | 1.9 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 40.1 in | 0.0 in | 40.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 42.8 in | 0.0 in | 42.8 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 36.3 in | 0.0 in | 36.3 in |
Total Legroom | 116.3 in (over 3 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 37.5 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.9 ft3 | 20.3 ft3 | -10.4 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 44.5 ft3 | 20.3 | 24.2 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 90.3 ft3 | 51.0 ft3 | 39.3 ft3 |
2006 Land Rover LR3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 216-horsepower 4.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
The third row seating configuration is just ingenious. Adults can ride comfortably and the seats stow flat with little effort. see full Land Rover LR3 review |
2005 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Three rows of seats. Seven people can actually fit. Two child sets and an adult can fit in the second row. Two human beings can fit in the third. see full Land Rover LR3 review |
2005 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
I CAN FIT IN THE 3RD ROW see full Land Rover LR3 review |
2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |