Land Rover LR3 (2007) vs. Toyota Prius (2015) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2007 Land Rover LR3 and 2015 Toyota Prius specs.
2007 Land Rover LR3 and 2015 Toyota Prius Specifications
Model Year |
2007 |
2015 |
|
Model |
Land Rover LR3 |
Toyota Prius |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Hatch |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
113.6 in |
106.3 in |
7.3 in |
Length |
190.9 in |
176.4 in |
14.5 in |
Width |
75.4 in |
68.7 in |
6.7 in |
Height |
74.1 in |
58.7 in |
15.4 in |
Curb Weight |
5135 lb. |
3042 lb. |
2093 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
22.8 gal. |
11.9 gal. |
10.9 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
40.4 in |
38.6 in |
1.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
59.2 in |
54.9 in |
4.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
0.0 in |
52.7 in |
-52.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
42.4 in |
42.5 in |
-0.1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
42.4 in |
37.6 in |
4.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
59.4 in |
53.1 in |
6.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
0.0 in |
51.2 in |
-51.2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
37.6 in |
36.0 in |
1.6 in |
Headroom, Row 3 |
40.1 in |
0.0 in |
40.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
42.8 in |
0.0 in |
42.8 in |
Legroom, Row 3 |
36.3 in |
0.0 in |
36.3 in |
Total Legroom |
116.3 in (over 3 rows) |
78.5 in (over 2 rows) |
37.8 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
9.9 ft3 |
21.6 ft3 |
-11.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
44.5 ft3 |
21.6 |
22.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
90.3 ft3 |
39.6 ft3 |
50.7 ft3 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Land Rover LR3
2006 |
4dr SUV 216-horsepower 4.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
The third row seating configuration is just ingenious. Adults can ride comfortably and the seats stow flat with little effort.
see full Land Rover LR3 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
2016 |
For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan.
The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable.
The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia.
Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX.
see full Toyota Prius review |
2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited.
Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility.
see full Toyota Prius review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Land Rover models.